Posted by: geognerd | January 24, 2011

On the Illinois “Use Tax”

I have been going through my receipts for the last couple of days, getting everything together for when I file my tax returns. I pay someone to do my taxes. My business expenses make things trickier and I figure someone who does taxes for a living would do a better job ensuring I pay as little income tax as legally possible.

As my faithful readers know, I am very thrifty and have an eye for value. As a result, I do a lot of shopping online. Pricing is better than at most brick-and-mortar stores, and I don’t have to pay sales tax when I buy from Amazon and Newegg.

Well, the State of Illinois has decided to make more of an effort to collect its Use Tax. This is a 6.25% tax on items you purchase outside of Illinois or online. As it is illegal for Illinois to charge a tax on out-of-state commerce, the state charges you a tax for using a product within the state’s boundaries. Basically, it’s a game of semantics. Everyone knows the Use Tax is a proxy for a sales tax. Methinks a savvy attorney could challenge the Use Tax law and get it taken off the books. Why isn’t a Use Tax charged on items bought within the state? They are being used, aren’t they?

The 2010 Illinois income tax return form (PDF) has a line asking if you owe any Use Tax on internet, mail order, or out-of-state purchases.

The instructions (PDF) have a worksheet where you can take the total cost of all the stuff you bought online and figure out the Use Tax you owe. You owe 6.25% on general merchandise and 1% on food, non-prescription drugs, and medical appliances. However, if you made no major purchases (whatever those are) and you do not have receipts, you can use a table to figure out your Use Tax obligation.

As you can see, these amounts are really quite reasonable. I have no problem paying this, even though I think the Use Tax is a bunch of bull. My adjusted gross income (AGI) would result in me paying $21 or $27 to the state in Use Tax. Their assumption is that I spent $336 to $432 online.

So here’s my quandary. I have records of all my online purchases going back to 2004. I could determine the exact amount of Use Tax I owe the state. There is also a Use Tax amnesty in effect. I can use form ST-44 (PDF) to report the Use Tax I owe from July 1, 2004 to December 31, 2010.

Would I do better to feign forgetfulness and poor record keeping, and just pay the $21-$27 listed in the table, or actually add up all my transactions from 2010?

I spent six hours (!) during the last two days visiting all the online retailers I patronize, saving all my receipts to PDF, and printing them out. I also entered everything into a spreadsheet to make it easier to calculate the Use Tax I would owe under the amnesty program. I should mention that the State of Illinois owes me $180 for my time and doing the Department of Revenue’s job for them. (I bill at $30/hr for my consulting work.)

In the end, I had 82 online transactions without state sales tax going back to August 2004. Here’s what the printed receipts and invoices looked like.

So would I fare better using the Use Tax table or using my actual receipts? Because I bought computer parts online last year, I would do better being forgetful and paying a Use Tax based on my AGI.

I had 28 online untaxed transactions last year. I keep good records because I itemize some business expenses in my taxes. However, this Use Tax requires that I keep records of personal items too. From computer games to 99-cent Amazon.com music downloads. I feel like there is a bit of an invasion of privacy here. I added everything up and put it into a nice spreadsheet for my tax preparer, listing the store, the date of purchase, the purchase price, and the shipping charge. Now suppose I just threw my receipts at my tax preparer. He would see everything I bought. What if I had bought a sex toy or Nazi literature online?

It looks like I will owe a few hundred dollars in Illinois Use Tax on the items I have bought since 2004. I am torn about paying this. I think it’s a dumb tax that I shouldn’t have to pay, shouldn’t have to calculate, and shouldn’t have to self-report. It is a good idea to participate in the Use Tax amnesty, though, because I’d rather pay the tax I supposedly owe than pay that tax plus a bunch of penalties.

But one has to ask, how will the state enforce this Use Tax? How do they know if I’m lying about not having receipts when I choose to pay $21 instead of $42? Retailers will fight the state over releasing transaction data for all their Illinois customers. It is an additional burden on the retailers.

How will the increased prominence of the Use Tax affect my online shopping? I’ll have to figure in the 6.25% Use Tax when I do price comparisons. I’ll also have to print my receipts to PDF when I’m not charged sales tax so I can report the Use Tax. On the bright side, I’ll still be getting out of county and city sales taxes. I looked at a receipt for some computer parts I bought in a local shop, and I paid 8% sales tax total. In the town where I live, the sales tax rate is 9.25%, so I would save 3% sales tax even if I do pay the Use Tax.

To those who believe I am hurting local retailers by buying online, there were some things not sold within an hour drive of my house. Like my computer monitor, my netbook, and my Bluetooth GPS receiver. It wasn’t a matter of bad pricing and high taxes at the local shops, it was a matter of product availability that made me buy online. I always include local stores in my price comparisons. I am always looking for the best price, no matter where it is, and being able to pick up an item locally and use it right away is a bonus.

In summary, I think I will be taking advantage of the Use Tax amnesty program. I’ll admit to finding out about the Use Tax a couple of years ago (definitely didn’t know about it in 2004) and not paying it. It was a pain in the butt. Now that there is a place on the tax return to pay it, I am more willing to pay. However, I think it’s silly that I am forced to keep track of every 99-cent song I buy on Amazon. The state should give you the option of paying 6.25% or paying a flat charge based on your income. People are more willing to pay taxes if they are easy to calculate and easy to pay.

Notice: This post and subsequent comments shall not be considered advice for filing your tax return. Please consult your tax professional or the Department of Revenue if you have questions. Because of liability issues, I will not approve comments that can be interpreted as tax advice.

Advertisement

Responses

  1. Do you really have to print out those receipts?

    • Probably not. I did it more to make a graphic point about how ridiculous it is that the state expects us to keep track of all those online transactions.

  2. [...] Use Tax recently.  That is kind of scary.  People are coming to my blog for info about taxes?  That blog entry currently comes up on the third page of Google when you search for “illinois use [...]

  3. I just learned about this tax – I honestly thought those purchases were tax-free since I was buying them from out-of-state. It seems a little unfair to come back now and tax them, since I might not have bought some of the stuff at all. I guess it’s my fault for being ignorant on the subject. I think I’ll just stop buying anything at all – maybe that’ll help the economy.

    I’m also a little preturbed by the assertion that buying from places like NewEgg and Amazon is taking jobs away from the local economies – who do you think delivers the products, or fixes the trucks that devlier them (or produces them for that matter), or paves the roads that they drive on – you get the point. Any commerce transactions taking place stimulate the ecomony.

    The real reason I wanted to post to this thread was that I wanted to point out something I found in my research on the topic. Downloaded music, games, etc. are not taxable under the law, since they are not “tangible property” – see below:

    “Information or data that is downloaded electronically, such as downloaded books,
    musical recordings, newspapers or magazines, does not constitute the transfer of
    tangible personal property. These types of transactions represent the transfer of
    intangibles and are thus not subject to Retailers’ Occupation and Use Tax.
    However, downloads of canned software, as defined more fully in Section
    130.1935 of this Part, are subject to Retailers’ Occupation and Use Tax.”

    • Good points. When I pay for an online purchase to be delivered, I am helping keep the delivery man employed. The delivery truck runs on gas or diesel. The state collects a tax on that fuel. We could go on and on about how the state really isn’t losing out on any revenue from our online purchases.

      Now for your info about downloaded products. I did not know about them being exempt. That in itself is a problem. Most regular folks don’t even know about the Use Tax. How are we supposed to know about minutiae like digital downloads being from the Use Tax? We shouldn’t have to do research just to pay our taxes.

  4. Thank you all for the input.

    I read on the Il Dept. of Rev. site, from a savvy guy asking an important question:

    If I file an ST-44, Illinois Use Tax Return, during the amnesty period, does it satisfy my liability with the Department of Revenue?

    ANSWER:

    If the Department of Revenue finds that you owe additional tax, we may assess the additional tax plus applicable penalties and interest. We conduct routine audits based on information received from third parties, including the U.S. Customs Service and other states.

    My comment: This is Amnesty?!!! Sounds like a trap to me.

    M.A.

    • I forgot something. By filing the ST-44, of course, you are extending the Statute of LImitations for another 6 years. Please tell me I’m wrong.

      M.A.

      • I think this whole Use Tax filing is complete rubbish. It makes an already complicated facet of our lives even more complicated (and expensive). If they are going to assess this tax, I think putting a line on the State 1040 was a good start. However, this amnesty should be a true amnesty. IL Dept of Revenue should just forgive any Use Tax that is owed prior to 2010 if they really want to offer amnesty, then begin enforcing from the 2010 year onward. It would be a damned shame if anyone who filed the ST-44 were audited. Someone shouldn’t be penalized for trying to follow the letter of a stupid law. Anyone who files the ST-44 should be flagged in the system as deserving a free pass from further scrutiny.

        If the State is serious about collecting the Use Tax, here’s my free tip to Governor Quinn and the IL Dept of Revenue: Investigate anyone between ages 18 and 35 who claimed not to owe any Use Tax. Those folks are the most likely to have ordered something online that would not have had sales tax collected by the retailer.

  5. What is considered a “major purchase”?

    • Good question.

      • The instruction book with my tax form uses an example of “if you purchased cheese by mail order from a company in Wisconsin and paid no sales tax, you owe 1 percent Illinois Use Tax” How is CHEESE a “major purchase”?? How is this legal!? I’m SO MAD right now. I totally want to move to Indiana.

  6. If one of the criteria for the use tax is “used or consumed in Illinois,” then I interpret that to mean that gifts purchased via online/catalog for people outside of the state are exempt. In which case, how can the state determine whether the online/catalog purchases are for an Illinois resident or for a non-Illinois resident without consulting the buyer? Just a thought, because a significant percentage of my online purchases in previous years were gifts I had shipped to me but were “consumed” elsewhere.

    I am caught in the same dilemma as geognerd: I wish to honestly pay what I owe the state, and want to avoid late fees & penalties… but I’m finding it extremely difficult to determine what that honest amount actually IS, especially since I don’t think I could track down a majority of my purchases prior to 2009.

  7. Have to add this. I know there are very expensive bottles of liquor out there. But I would like to know if IDR cites a dollar amount. Otherwise, the examples are useless.

  8. Asked the IDOR what a “major purchase” was. They said that there are no specific guidelines for that!!! How are we supposed to deal with this stuff?

    • This doesn’t surprise me. I work in government, and there are some laws we are charged with enforcing, but have no guidance. Legislators pass laws, but don’t think about how they will be enforced, or if they can even be enforced.

  9. 3 things
    1st if you pay tax to another state at less than the Illinois Use Tax rates, you must pay Illinois the difference IL 6.25% Indiana is 7% but Wisconson’s 5% and Missiouri 4.2% (from Wikipedia)
    so someone traveling out of state has to figure when they bring something back to IL did they pay enough?

    Little more effort then tracking your online purchases?

    2nd the IL revune website states
    In 1955, the General Assembly passed the Use Tax Act
    (doubt they imagined the revenue from internet sales)
    and Other states have put a Use Tax line on their income tax returns.

    checked this on Wiki 22 states in 2007 have the use tax on income tax form
    and a group of states have joined “Streamlined Sales Tax Project”
    44 member states 24 passed laws to have internet retailers to collect tax on sales to customers living in the Streamlined states
    IL and 9 others are a members with legislation pending to collect for other states

    Every FAQ and mission statement mentions this is to level the playing field between online retailers and brick and morter stores.

    Quick survey: Who thinks this more about collecting revenue then protecting the small business owner?

    3rd The use tax form has the 6.25% for general merchandise and the 1.0% for food, drugs, and medical appliances.
    one of the comments above said electronic downloads are exempt not sure if that would be true in all cases
    many software EULA now states you are buying a license to use so no copy is yours to do with it as you want
    same with proprietary files that must play over specific E-readers or song files that must be accessed over the internet or through an account login
    an Mp3 that is downloaded, not encripted, and be shared may be considered merchandise

    first it was voluntary, then states went after retailers, what next credit card companies?
    Now track purchased goods, shipping,and taxes seperately?

  10. All of these taxes our politicians keep tacking on really make me sick and depressed. They probably make all of us depressed so no wonder our economy is depressed too!

    It’s sad to know that these taxes go into the coffers to pay for the prison cell, food, health care, etc. for our corrupt Illinois ex-governors. They should be charged a “use tax” for using us! Bastards!

    It also makes me sick that the politicians waste our money naming all of our public buildings after themselves. It takes money to change and maintain the signs on the buildings, change all the literature and websites with the new name, etc. Our Hoffman Estates Ice Arena just got renamed for someone who recently died who …tirelessly served the community blah, blah, blah… Give me a break. While I’m sorry he died of cancer or whatever, we all die of something someday. He got paid for serving didn’t he? We all bust our butt “tirelessly serving” the companies we work for and we pay taxes, but when we die, our companies don’t name a building after us. How about if we charge the politician’s family a “use tax” for putting their relative’s name on OUR building.

    Now I know there will be people who say that only costs a little, so that’s not where the spending problem is. But all these “only a little” stupid things add up to a lot of wasted money. It’s like when MacDonald’s ask’s you if you want to supersize it, “It only costs a little more…” Stop the stupid spending and stop the stupid taxing!

  11. I wish our elected officials could be as fiscally responsible as Geognerd and the rest of us. This Use Tax is yet another means for them to continue their spending. The harder I work to save what is left of my paycheck, the more the government wants me to hand over to pay for their lifestyle.
    I hope this current government mess encourages more people to become involved and let their voices be heard in the coming elections. VOTE!!!

  12. This stuff is so egregious. Now, all my friends & business associates are contacting me & asking what I’m going to do. Everyone, as tax deadlines are approaching, is in a quandary, including accountants. It seems few were aware… And I understand that Amazon & Overstock have been “forced” to end their affiliate programs in the state. I suppose most of those affiliates wiil leave since a major source of their revenue is gone. Coupled with the huge state income tax increase, this has to be a low point for many in this state.

  13. I’ll freely admit I’ve purchased major items online; high-end camera gear for example. But often times I use this equipment out-of-state. I think 50% of my photography last year was in Indiana, for example. Should I reduce my Illinois “use tax” by 50%?

  14. I liked the idea of the State Of Illinois not penalizing taxpayers and giving people a chance to pay the use tax but this whole thing is confusing to say the least. And now we have the the “Amazon Tax” amendment to HB3659. I’ve heard from a few people that Illinois will actually lose both income tax revenue and sales tax revenue @Mary Anne because affiliates (consumers/taxpayers) will be forced to leave the state, more job losses in Illinois due to an inconsiderate amendment.

    More info here and here

  15. Per IDOR’s Pub. 8, UNFILED use tax returns ARE subject to a six year statute of limitations. Period.

  16. The Tax Defenders are a group of attorneys? The ending of the Amazon program with its affiliates is not about consumers leaving the state! Its about Amazon’s end of partnerships with small IL businesses. Check it out on the web. This does not help the state or those living here. If you want a real eyeopener, see http://www.404techsupport.com/2011/03/10/il-governor-quinn-signs-amazon-tax.

    If I’m mistaken about this, I’ll welcome your correction, Tax Defenders.

  17. I take my taxes seriously. But, I was never aware of this tax. I just had a lunch with a friend’s friend who retired from CTA and is like 50 and will be getting like 75% of his salary for the rest of his life as he took an early retirement, but he said that he will be working for some other company and making 2 incomes. No amount of taxes will be enough with these kind of outlandish and lavish expenses.

    Getting back to the topic. One of the main attraction with buying online is the lack of tax, if I were to pay taxes, I would not have made the purchase. I just do not leave my house anymore. Will there be a tax on breathing the air and just looking at the sky. I have already decreased my spending equal to the increase in income tax.

  18. [...] wrote one of my most-viewed blog posts ever.  It was about the new enforcement of the Illinois Use Tax.  Freaky to think people thought to [...]

  19. Where on the IDR site are examples of major purchases provided? I have to read this for myself. A bottle of liquor is a major purchase?!


Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.